Chief Investment Officer
Concern
“I need faster cycles, without adding risk the board can’t see.”
Outcome
Daily SAA with provenance your Investment Committee can defend. Every recommendation ships signable, with the dissent record attached.
Who it is for
One concern, one outcome, per role.
Each buyer in a pension fund has a different reason to care and a different reason to push back. Keelpilot meets each one on their own terms — no feature lists, no role-agnostic marketing.
Chief Risk Officer
Concern
“Model risk I cannot defend to OSFI is career-limiting.”
Outcome
Four architectural firewalls, an L4 autonomy cap, and contractual human sign-off. Math is deterministic — the language model never signs a trade.
Head of Strategic Asset Allocation
Concern
“I am rate-limited by committee cadence, not by analysis.”
Outcome
Propose → review → decide compresses from quarters to days. Your team configures the IPS; Keelpilot operates within it and does not reinterpret it.
Chief Operating & Technology Officer
Concern
“Another vendor, another integration bill, another audit cycle.”
Outcome
AWS-native, per-tenant, ca-central-1. Integrates where Aladdin, Charles River, or SimCorp already live. No parallel stack, no token reselling, no shared compute.
Board & Investment Committee
Concern
“Can someone sign their name to this, and would I?”
Outcome
Board-ready memos with the full dissent record surfaced — not buried. You see what the reviewers challenged, not just the summary.
Internal & External Auditor
Concern
“Reconstructing decisions after the fact is slow and expensive.”
Outcome
Every stage is typed, timestamped, and archived. Reconstruction is a database query with an audit-friendly schema — not a forensic exercise across unstructured text.